FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Force vs Faith: Why Counterinsurgency Tactics Differ for Islamists and Nationalists in North Caucasus

Islamist violencenationalist violencecounterinsurgency tacticsNorth CaucasusComparative Politics@APSR2 R filesDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

This article compares Islamist and nationalist violence in Russia's North Caucasus using new data. It finds that Islamist groups' attacks are less sensitive to government counterinsurgency tactics than those of nationalists. Specifically, selective force suppresss nationalists but not Islamists.

The key finding stems from differences in rebels' support structures: Nationalist movements rely more on local populations, while Islamist insurgents maintain operations despite limited local backing.

These insights offer crucial understanding for governments navigating similar conflicts elsewhere and for political science research on rebel motivations.

Article card for article: Islamists and Nationalists: Rebel Motivation and Counterinsurgency in Russia's North Caucasus
Islamists and Nationalists: Rebel Motivation and Counterinsurgency in Russia's North Caucasus was authored by Yuri Zhukov and Monica Duffy Toft. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2015.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
American Political Science Review