FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

EU Oversight Effective? Yes, but They Strategically Drop Cases of Intentional Noncompliance.

EU OversightCompliance StrategiesIntentional NoncomplianceStrategic Dropping Of CasesEuropean PoliticsAPSR1 R file1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
European Politics subfield banner

New research explores how the EU Commission handles infringement cases against member states.

The paper develops a formal model to analyze legal compliance in the European Union (2003-2013). This study collects and analyzes over 13,000 official case files. The findings reveal both accidental and intentional violations exist within EU law.

🔍 Data & Methods: Examined extensive Commission infringement records from two decades of EU governance.

📊 Key Findings: Accidental noncompliance occurs; Intentional violation is more common; Commission selectively drops cases.

⚖️ Why It Matters: This analysis shows the EU enforcement mechanism has mixed success in promoting legal adherence.

Article card for article: The Politics of International Oversight: Strategic Monitoring and Legal Compliance in the European Union
The Politics of International Oversight: Strategic Monitoring and Legal Compliance in the European Union was authored by Joshua Fjelstul and Clifford Carrubba. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Edit article record marker