The 1992 Los Angeles riot sparked debate on whether violent protests increase policy support. Using geocoded data and analyzing polling station records before and after the event near an election, this study finds a counterintuitive result: the riot led to a marked liberal shift in voter preferences.
### Data & Methods
This research analyzes polling station records from Los Angeles County before and after the 1992 uprising. The analysis leverages geocoded data pinpointing locations affected by the event's temporal proximity to voters' casting decisions.
### Key Findings
Contrary to expectations, the riot did not hinder political engagement but amplified it:
* Liberal Shift: A significant increase in support for liberal policies at the polls.
* Voter Mobilization: The effect was driven by increased turnout among both African American and white voters.
* Long Endurance: This mobilization impact persisted over a decade post-riot.
### Why It Matters
This study challenges conventional wisdom about violent political events. It demonstrates that such dramatic occurrences can paradoxically catalyze political participation, leading to unexpected shifts in public opinion.
| Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot was authored by Ryan Enos, Aaron R. Kaufman and Melissa L. Sands. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2019. |
