NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Violent Protests Boost Policy Support, Not Reduce It — New Study on 1992 LA Riot

The 1992 Los Angeles riot sparked debate on whether violent protests increase policy support. Using geocoded data and analyzing polling station records before and after the event near an election, this study finds a counterintuitive result: the riot led to a marked liberal shift in voter preferences.

Data & Methods

This research analyzes polling station records from Los Angeles County before and after the 1992 uprising. The analysis leverages geocoded data pinpointing locations affected by the event's temporal proximity to voters' casting decisions.

Key Findings

Contrary to expectations, the riot did not hinder political engagement but amplified it:

  • Liberal Shift: A significant increase in support for liberal policies at the polls.
  • Voter Mobilization: The effect was driven by increased turnout among both African American and white voters.
  • Long Endurance: This mobilization impact persisted over a decade post-riot.

Why It Matters

This study challenges conventional wisdom about violent political events. It demonstrates that such dramatic occurrences can paradoxically catalyze political participation, leading to unexpected shifts in public opinion.

American Political Science Review
Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot was authored by Ryan Enos, Aaron R. Kaufman and Melissa L. Sands. It was published in APSR in 2019. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S0003055419000340
American Politics subfield banner