FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Does Money Buy Access? Field Experiment Reveals Campaign Contributions Facilitate Congressional Meetings.

Campaign ContributionsRandomized Field ExperimentCongressional AccessDeregulation DecisionsAmerican PoliticsAJPS1 datasetDataverse
American Politics subfield banner

Concerns that political donations secure preferential treatment from lawmakers have long been debated. However, assessing their effects on policy maker behavior has proven difficult due to ethical constraints and correlational data.

Data & Methods:

A randomized field experiment involving 191 congressional offices tested whether campaign donors could gain meeting access through contributions. The political organization attempted meetings with prospective attendees who were campaign contributors in districts across the US.

Key Finding: $250M Impact:

When informed that attendees were political donors, senior policy makers made themselves available 3-4 times more often than usual.

Why It Matters:

These findings underscore concerns about Supreme Court decisions deregulating campaign finance post-Citizens United. The results suggest donation networks may bypass traditional vote-for-service incentives.

Article card for article: Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment
Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment was authored by Joshua Kalla and David Broockman. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker