FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

How do federal court rulings influence state policy borrowing? New findings from text analysis

Court DecisionsPolicy DiffusionState Policy AdoptionConstitutional RulingsLaw Courts JusticeAJPSDataverse

💡 Data & Methods: Employed computational text analysis to model how states borrow directly from one another's laws, focusing on the impact of federal appellate court decisions.

📏 Key Findings: Court rulings significantly affect both policy adoption and text borrowing. Rulings finding statutes unconstitutional can reduce state adoption probability by up to 28%, while affirmations increase it similarly and encourage states to borrow more than double their preexisting law's text.

🛠 Why It Matters: This research illuminates the concrete mechanisms through which federal courts shape state policy diffusion, moving beyond abstract notions of influence.

Article Card
Into the Words: Using Statutory Text to Explore the Impact of Federal Courts on State Policy Diffusion was authored by Rachael K. Hinkle. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2015.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
data