This study investigates how partisan depictions affect public acceptance of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Context and Motivation
Public views of the Supreme Court as both a legal institution and political entity create tension that influences decision reception.
Methodology
Survey experiments examine responses to different cues (Republican, general) while varying institutional/legal/issue characteristics.
Key Findings
1. Party Cues: Framing decisions as Republican significantly lowers acceptance more than generic framing or court branding alone.
2. Polarization's Role: Political polarization amplifies the negative effect of partisan cues.
3. Court Uniqueness Questioned: Adding "Supreme Court" attribution minimally increases baseline acceptance and does not reduce partisan cue effects.
These results suggest that perceived institutional legitimacy may be less influential than partisanship or political framing when shaping public opinion about the highest court.
| Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions was authored by Stephen P. Nicholson and Thomas G. Hansford. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2014. |
