FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

CCTs Boost Incumbent Votes in Brazil Elections—Even When Different Parties?

Conditional Cash TransfersBrazil ElectionsIncumbent AdvantageVoter Turnout EffectsLatin American Politics@AJPS3 datasetsDataverse
Latin American Politics subfield banner

Data & Methods: Examined municipal election results and survey data from 2002-2010 using propensity score matching to isolate electoral impacts.

Key Findings:

* The study reveals conditional cash transfers (CCTs) consistently increased votes for the incumbent party candidate across all three analyzed elections.

* Counterintuitively, these vote boosts were achieved by incumbents from different parties during consecutive election cycles.

* Importantly, CCTs did not influence party identification or affect legislative election outcomes.

Why It Matters:

This suggests that while CCT programs can significantly impact short-term voting for the current administration in Brazil, they do not appear to drive lasting changes in voter alignment.

Article card for article: When Pay Outs Pay Off: Conditional Cash-Transfers and Voting Behavior in Brazil 2002-2010
When Pay Outs Pay Off: Conditional Cash-Transfers and Voting Behavior in Brazil 2002-2010 was authored by Cesar Zucco. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2013.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science