FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Senate Delays: Why Some Executive Nominees Face Obstruction While Others Don’t

Confirmation Delay StrategyIdeological AlignmentPresidents Vs SenatorsInstitutional PoliticsAmerican PoliticsAJPS2 Stata filesDataverse
American Politics subfield banner

Presidents face a puzzle in Senate confirmation delays for executive nominees.

Senate Delay Strategy: This study argues delay is used strategically by the Senate to shield allied agencies from presidential influence.

Using CQ Executive Directory data (1987-2012), we analyze thousands of nominations across diverse contexts.

Our findings demonstrate that delay occurs when an agency aligns with senators' ideological preferences, regardless of nominee political leanings.

This discovery explains the seemingly arbitrary nature of delays in previous research and reveals how collective legislative action functions as a counter-instrument to presidential power.

Article card for article: The Logic of Collective Inaction: Senatorial Delay in Executive Nominations
The Logic of Collective Inaction: Senatorial Delay in Executive Nominations was authored by Ian Ostrander. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker