FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Vote Buying Enforcement Requires Small-Scale Monitoring for Compliance

Latin American Politics subfield banner

Vote buying persists despite democratic safeguards. This article explains why: brokers enforce deals through published results only when monitoring small voter groups is feasible.

Key Finding: Brokers target compliance in small voting blocs to sustain vote-buying networks.

Evidence from Colombia shows a clear negative correlation between polling station size and reported manipulation.

A robust relationship exists: Smaller stations facilitate broker enforcement via collective monitoring, as demonstrated through various identification techniques including regression discontinuity designs.

Why It Matters: This finding highlights how democratic institutions can be undermined by seemingly unrelated features of electoral systems.

Article card for article: Small Aggregates, Big Manipulation: Vote Buying Enforcement and Collective Monitoring
Small Aggregates, Big Manipulation: Vote Buying Enforcement and Collective Monitoring was authored by Miguel Rueda. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science