NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Stronger Legislatures Mean Riskier Bonds

Does legislative strength reduce or increase credit risk? We explore this counterintuitive question by analyzing state general obligation bond ratings and measures of institutional capacity.

⚖️ Legislative Capacity: The ability to effectively draft, debate, and pass legislation varies significantly across states.

💰 Credit Risk Evaluations: Using nearly two decades of American state bond data, we find a strong negative correlation between legislative capacity and credit risk. States with more capable legislatures tend to have higher perceived credit risk in their bonds.

🔍 Data & Methods: Ratings come from major bond rating agencies covering almost all US states over an extended period. Institutional strength is gauged through multiple indicators including the efficiency of policy-making, legislative size, and political responsiveness.

💡 Key Findings: Higher capacity correlates with greater credit risk, even after accounting for other economic factors and state policies. This suggests that market actors perceive capable legislatures as introducing more policy uncertainty.

📍 Why It Matters: The findings challenge conventional wisdom about institutional strength and offer new insights into how democratic responsiveness impacts financial markets.

American Journal of Political Science
Legislative Capacity and Credit Risk was authored by David Fortunato and Ian R. Turner. It was published in AJPS in 2018. Find on Google Scholar10.1111/ajps.12368
American Politics subfield banner