FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

New Experiments Reveal Hawkdom's Surprising Domestic Edge in Foreign Policy

International Relations subfield banner

The adage "only Nixon could go to China" suggests hawks face fewer domestic barriers to pursuing foreign enemies' reconciliation. However, empirical evidence was mixed until now.

What We Found

• Survey experiments show hawks have a clear advantage domestically when initiating rapprochement with foreign powers.

• This advantage holds regardless of whether the resulting diplomatic efforts succeed or fail.

Why Hawkdom Works Better

Two key mechanisms appear responsible for this finding:

• Voters more readily trust hawkish leaders' conciliatory initiatives than dovish ones.

• The public often misclassifies hawks who pursue diplomacy as moderate, reducing opposition to their actions.

Implications

These findings suggest a significant role for strategic perception in international relations. They provide microfoundational support for theories that emphasize domestic political calculations alongside external threats.

Article card for article: Hawks, Doves, and Peace: An Experimental Approach
Hawks, Doves, and Peace: An Experimental Approach was authored by Michaela Mattes and Jessica Weeks. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science