FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Judicializing Economic Social Cultural Rights Has Surprising Downsides

judicializationconstitutional inclusioneconomic rightscivil libertiesInternational Relations@AJPS1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
International Relations subfield banner

For years, international bodies like the UN and NGOs have advocated for judicializing economic social cultural rights (ESCRs). This article examines the effects of including three specific ESCR-related provisions in national constitutions: education, health, and social security. Using a large panel covering annual data from 160 countries between 1960-2010, we find no clear evidence that constitutional inclusion leads to broadly positive outcomes across society.

However, the study does document significant negative effects down the road on several fronts: educational indicators show unexpected declines; inflation rates spike after such provisions are added; and civil liberties face increased restrictions during this transition period. These findings suggest a complex relationship between formally embedding ESCRs in constitutions and producing positive social results.

Article card for article: Do Social Rights Affect Social Outcomes?
Do Social Rights Affect Social Outcomes? was authored by Christian Bjørnskov and Jacob Mchangama. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science