FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Honesty in Negotiations: How Uncertainty Spares Diplomats

Political Theory subfield banner

When cooperation is subjective, mutual uncertainty actually encourages honest behavior and reliable signaling between actors.

➡️ What's New

This study presents a formal model showing how incomplete information about each other's preferences can incentivize truthfulness in diplomatic interactions.

➡️ How It Works

Senders genuinely uncertain whether their actions will be perceived as cooperative have less incentive to misrepresent intentions and more reason to pursue authentic goals. Credible signals then emerge naturally from this mutual uncertainty.

➡️ Why This Matters

This finding challenges conventional assumptions about incomplete information in bargaining models, offering new insights into international relations during periods of strategic ambiguity.

Using the Sino-Soviet split as a historical example and connecting to contemporary U.S.-China relations, the research demonstrates how this mechanism might explain successful diplomatic outcomes despite persistent uncertainties. Keywords: Subjective Cooperation, Honest Signaling, Uncertainty Management, Cold War Diplomacy, International Negotiations

Article card for article: Offsetting Uncertainty: Reassurance with Two-sided Incomplete Information
Offsetting Uncertainty: Reassurance with Two-sided Incomplete Information was authored by Kyle Haynes and Brandon K. Yoder. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science