NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Honesty in Negotiations: How Uncertainty Spares Diplomats

When cooperation is subjective, mutual uncertainty actually encourages honest behavior and reliable signaling between actors.

➡️ What's New

This study presents a formal model showing how incomplete information about each other's preferences can incentivize truthfulness in diplomatic interactions.

➡️ How It Works

Senders genuinely uncertain whether their actions will be perceived as cooperative have less incentive to misrepresent intentions and more reason to pursue authentic goals. Credible signals then emerge naturally from this mutual uncertainty.

➡️ Why This Matters

This finding challenges conventional assumptions about incomplete information in bargaining models, offering new insights into international relations during periods of strategic ambiguity.

Using the Sino-Soviet split as a historical example and connecting to contemporary U.S.-China relations, the research demonstrates how this mechanism might explain successful diplomatic outcomes despite persistent uncertainties. Keywords: Subjective Cooperation, Honest Signaling, Uncertainty Management, Cold War Diplomacy, International Negotiations

American Journal of Political Science
Offsetting Uncertainty: Reassurance with Two-sided Incomplete Information was authored by Kyle Haynes and Brandon K. Yoder. It was published in AJPS in 2020. Find on Google Scholar10.1111/ajps.12464
Political Theory subfield banner