FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & CourtsđŸŽ”
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & CourtsđŸŽ”
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & CourtsđŸŽ”
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Why Moderation Boosts Competence: Ideological Extremes Damage Party Reputation

European Politics subfield banner

Does a party's ideology affect its standing among voters? This study suggests that ideological moderation enhances perceived competence. We find that parties leaning left or right are viewed as less willing to compromise and more prone to simplistic solutions, reducing their appeal for competence.

Through conjoint experiments with British citizens (N=2000), we demonstrate that even slight ideological leanings harm a party's valence reputation—a key aspect of electoral success—regardless of voter alignment. This effect operates via three mechanisms: willingness to compromise, realism about achievable policy goals, and preference for nuanced solutions.

Our findings highlight how moderate positioning serves as an implicit signal of effectiveness in governance.

Article card for article: Moderation and Competence: How a Party's Ideological Position Shapes Its Valence Reputation
Moderation and Competence: How a Party's Ideological Position Shapes Its Valence Reputation was authored by Robert Johns and Ann‐Kristin Kölln. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science