FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why Canada's Political Parties Became More Cohesive: Sorting and Agenda Control Explained

Partisan SortingGovernment Agenda ControlCanadian PoliticsLegislative VotingComparative PoliticsBJPS14 R files2 datasetsDataverse

This paper explores mechanisms explaining legislative voting unity among Canadian political parties from 1867 to 2011. Using all recorded votes from the House of Commons, we find partisan sorting—where elected MPs align with their party's ideological positions—and government agenda control significantly enhance party cohesion over time.

Key Findings: Partisan Sorting and Government Agenda Control are central mechanisms driving voting unity in Canada's Parliament.

Our analysis underscores the importance of integrating institutional rules and legislative agendas into models explaining parliamentary voting behavior. The results highlight how strict party discipline can emerge even within a diverse multi-party system, offering insights relevant to comparative political studies.

Article Card
Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada (1867 - 2011) was authored by Jean-François Godbout and Bjørn Høyland. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
data