FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Why Canada's Political Parties Became More Cohesive: Sorting and Agenda Control Explained

Comparative Politics subfield banner

This paper explores mechanisms explaining legislative voting unity among Canadian political parties from 1867 to 2011. Using all recorded votes from the House of Commons, we find partisan sorting—where elected MPs align with their party's ideological positions—and government agenda control significantly enhance party cohesion over time.

Key Findings: Partisan Sorting and Government Agenda Control are central mechanisms driving voting unity in Canada's Parliament.

Our analysis underscores the importance of integrating institutional rules and legislative agendas into models explaining parliamentary voting behavior. The results highlight how strict party discipline can emerge even within a diverse multi-party system, offering insights relevant to comparative political studies.

Article card for article: Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada (1867 - 2011)
Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada (1867 - 2011) was authored by Jean-François Godbout and Bjørn Høyland. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science