NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Procedural Fairness Overrated? Outcomes Trump Acceptance in Policy Decisions

This article questions the central role of procedures in decision acceptance.

While acknowledging procedural fairness' importance, we argue outcome favorability is paramount.

➡️ Our Core Argument:

  • Procedural means have limited impact on accepting government policy decisions
  • Outcome fairness overwhelmingly determines willingness to accept authoritative decisions

➡️ New Insights from Data & Methods:

We unified key variables into one causal model and tested it using experimental data.

➡️ Key Findings:

Our results confirm previous research but show procedures' lesser importance.

Both vignette studies and field experiments support our outcome-focused predictions.

British Journal of Political Science
Reconsidering the Role of Procedures for Decision-Acceptance was authored by Peter Esaiasson, Mikael Persson, Mikael Gilljam and Torun Lindholm. It was published in BJPS in 2019. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S0007123416000508
Political Behavior subfield banner