FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Electoral Rules Shape Campaigns: How Candidate-Centred Systems Drive Mobilization

Electoral InstitutionsCandidate-Centred SystemsCampaign Behavior ChangesParliamentary ElectionsComparative PoliticsBJPS1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

Electoral institutions profoundly influence campaign activities at the individual level, according to new comparative research.

Data & Methods:

This study analyzes candidate-level data from multiple national parliamentary elections using advanced quantitative techniques. Researchers directly compared mobilization strategies across different electoral systems.

Key Findings:

• Candidate-centred electoral rules correlate with more intensive and complex campaign efforts

• These institutional frameworks significantly shift focus toward personal rather than party-level appeals

• The study reveals substantial variations in political engagement tactics based on institutional design

Real-World Relevance:

These findings demonstrate that electoral institutions impact political competition far beyond their established effects on parties and representation. Understanding these dynamics provides crucial insights for scholars and policymakers seeking to enhance democratic processes.

Article card for article: A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns
A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns was authored by Laura Sudulich and Siim Trumm. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker