FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Policy Responsiveness Not Equal for Men and Women Despite Similar Representation Gains

Substantive RepresentationDescriptive Representationresponsiveness gapparliamentary gender quotasWestern Europe countriesTSCS analysisEuropean Politics@BJPS5 R files3 datasetsDataverse
European Politics subfield banner

This study investigates gender bias among political parties.

Data & Methods: Analyzed 351 party policy shifts across sixty-eight Western European parties over time using a time-series cross-sectional approach. The analysis included twelve countries to provide broad regional coverage.

Key Finding 1: While all political parties respond equally to preference changes from both genders, they show greater responsiveness toward male voters' shifting preferences compared to female voters'.

Key Finding 2: The presence of women in parliament does not alter this responsiveness gap.

Why It Matters

This research challenges the long-standing assumption that descriptive representation in legislatures automatically leads to substantive responsiveness toward women's policy preferences. The findings highlight a persistent gender gap in political responsiveness despite efforts to increase female representation.

Article card for article: Are Parties Equally Responsive to Women and Men?
Are Parties Equally Responsive to Women and Men? was authored by Jonathan Homola. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science