NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Trump’s Brand of Racism & Sexism Boosted Democrats in 2018 Midterms

Key Insight: The 2018 U.S. House elections saw a notable shift: voters previously less concerned with race and gender issues swung strongly toward Democratic candidates.

Why? This change occurred despite Republican appeals to counter-racism and anti-sexism, suggesting Trump's divisive rhetoric inadvertently normalized these factors as politically relevant.

What Changed: Hostile sexism and denial of racism became stronger predictors for House votes than in 2016.

This increase stemmed from a crucial realignment: voters with less racist/sexist attitudes shifted away from Republican candidates.

How Researchers Explain It: This phenomenon signals that Trump's explicit hostility toward minorities and women may have transformed these issues into central components of the GOP brand, ultimately creating an electoral penalty for Republican nominees in 2018.

British Journal of Political Science
The Heightened Importance of Racism and Sexism in the 2018 U.S. Midterm Elections was authored by Brian Schaffner. It was published in BJPS in 2022. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S0007123420000319
American Politics subfield banner