NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

More Accurate? Yes. But Polarized? Still the Same for Political Elites & Citizens.

This letter compares factual belief polarization between government officials and the American public.

Data & Methods: Using a paired survey approach across politically contentious topics.

Key Findings: Officials are consistently more factually accurate than citizens. However, this accuracy doesn't reduce their partisan polarization on facts.

Why It Matters: It suggests that simply having better information won't bridge the gap between elite and public beliefs in US politics.

The study highlights a persistent challenge: even when elites have superior factual knowledge, they remain just as polarized on politically contested issues. This finding challenges assumptions about how greater political knowledge might align beliefs across different groups.

British Journal of Political Science
More Accurate, but No Less Polarized: Comparing the Factual Beliefs of Government Officials and the Public was authored by Nathan Lee, Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler and D.J. Flynn. It was published in BJPS in 2021. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S000712342000037X
American Politics subfield banner