NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Lowering affective polarization did not reduce false-news sharing or improve discernment

This study asks whether reducing affective polarization — people’s negative feelings toward opposing partisans — causally changes intentions to share true or false political news online. Using an experimental approach, the authors report that improving feelings toward out-party members relative to one’s own party produced no measurable change in intentions to share true news, false news, or in the gap between them (truth discernment). They also test an accuracy reminder and find modest evidence that such a prompt can improve truth discernment for respondents who report sharing political news. The paper argues these experimental results call for reexamining the assumed causal role of affective polarization in misinformation spread, while preserving the conditional and limited nature of the observed effects.

Research & Politics
Reducing affective polarization does not affect false news sharing or truth discernment was authored by Carter Anderson, Oliver Byles, Joshua Calianos, Sade Francis, Chun Hey Brian Kot, Bennett Mosk, H. Nephi Seo, Julija Vizbaras and Brendan Nyhan. It was published in R&P in 2026. Find on Google Scholar10.1177/20531680251413944
Political Behavior subfield banner