FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

How Do Democracies Decide What Content Gets Censored? New Google Data Reveals Key Triggers.

Comparative Politics subfield banner

Digital censorship is increasingly common even within democracies, raising questions about political motivations behind it.

The study uses new cross-national data from Google detailing government requests for content removal and user information. It demonstrates that governments censor more when faced with internal dissent or strong economies producing substantial intellectual property (IP).

However, this tendency is moderated by democratic electoral systems: proportional representation reduces censorship demands. The findings suggest a complex relationship where economic factors fuel censorship pressure, but institutional design shapes its implementation.

Google Dataset

The research relies on previously unavailable government requests data provided directly to Google researchers across multiple countries and time periods.

Electoral Systems

By comparing centralized (e.g., FPTP) and decentralized systems like proportional representation, the analysis highlights institutional variation as a key determinant of censorship levels.

Article card for article: Google Politics: The Political Determinants of Internet Censorship in Democracies
Google Politics: The Political Determinants of Internet Censorship in Democracies was authored by Stephen A. Meserve and Daniel Pemstein. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods