NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Democrats versus Democracy: The Southern Response to the Voting Rights Act

Article Abstract:

How do dominant groups respond to electoral interventions designed to help minority groups? This article posits that when democratizing interventions empowering subordinate groups are imposed upon dominant groups, dominant groups alter institutions to protect their power. I provide evidence of this in the context of the Voting Rights Act, which enfranchised millions of Black people in the South despite opposition from white elites. Using difference-in-differences design, I show that white incumbents reduced the numbers of county elected officials serving residents in parts of the South under federal supervision 1959–1965 to reduce representation for Black voters without directly blocking votes. I further show that efforts to blunt the electoral effects of Black enfranchisement were most pronounced in counties with large Black populations and large historical Democratic majorities. These findings suggest that when confronted with reforms that constrain their electoral power, dominant groups respond with de-democratizing manipulations of political institutions.

Journal of Politics
Democrats versus Democracy: The Southern Response to the Voting Rights Act was authored by Mayya Komisarchik. It was published in JOP in 2026. Find on Google Scholar10.1086/734538
Voting and Elections subfield banner