NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Does Civil Service in Bureaucracies Mitigate Patronage?

This article investigates the relationship between formal civil service systems and patronage practices within contemporary bureaucracies. The author examines how institutionalized hiring procedures, defined career paths, and performance-based advancement mechanisms influence informal reward networks.

Data & Methods

The study analyzes comprehensive datasets from multiple countries spanning post-war period to 2020, employing mixed-methods including quantitative regression analysis alongside qualitative case studies of bureaucratic reforms. Countries studied include: Brazil, Italy, India, Mexico; Continents covered are Latin America and Africa.

Key Findings

  • Civil service systems reduce explicit patronage networks in high-capacity government departments.
  • However, informal practices persist but become more subtle or disguised as merit-based advancement.
  • In rapidly transitioning economies (post-authoritarian states), formalization often triggers a spike in hidden patronage mechanisms.

Why It Matters

The findings challenge simplistic assumptions about civil service reform. While professionalization curbs overt favoritism, it creates blind spots for more insidious forms of institutional corruption that require different governance approaches to address.

Journal of Politics
Civil Service and Patronage in Bureaucracies was authored by John Huber and Michael Ting. It was published in JOP in 2021. Find on Google Scholar10.1086/711057
Public Administration subfield banner