This paper examines unexpected political consequences stemming from mid-campaign judicial decisions. By analyzing a specific case study, it explores how such rulings impact campaign strategies and leadership responsiveness. The findings reveal that court interventions during elections can significantly shape policy adaptation patterns among candidates.
| Unveiling: An Unexpected Mid-campaign Court Ruling's Consequences and the Limits of Following the Leader was authored by Aengus Bridgman, Costin Ciobanu, Aaron Erlich, Danielle Bohonos and Christopher Ross. It was published by Chicago in JOP in 2021. |
