This paper argues residential mobility hurdles significantly shape public views on immigration. Examining domestic housing policies and their constraints reveals a key driver of growing restrictionism, even outside traditional economic crises.
Data & Methods
- Analyzed national surveys from the US/EU region (2015-2023)
- Employed mixed-methods approach combining quantitative analysis with qualitative case studies
- Traced policy changes and their implementation across multiple countries
Key Findings
- Overwhelming majority of surveyed populations face documented mobility barriers
(over 85%)
- Statistically significant correlation exists between higher perceived residential constraints and stronger public support for immigration restrictions
- Cross-national comparisons highlight shared housing market dynamics driving similar policy preferences despite geographic differences in implementation
Policy Implications
The findings suggest policymakers cannot ignore domestic institutional arrangements when designing immigration policies. Addressing mobility issues may indirectly reduce the political pressure to restrict entry.
