NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Affluent Campuses Don't Bridge the Political Participation Gap for Low-Income Students

College attendance boosts political participation overall, but does attending an affluent campus help close a gap between income groups? A large panel survey (201,011 students) investigates this question. Using controls and tests for selection bias, we find that predominantly affluent campuses do not change the level of increase in political engagement across different income levels; they leave the gap unchanged. We examine multiple mechanisms behind any effects.

Our findings challenge assumptions about campus environments equalizing participation by showing no differential impact based on socioeconomic diversity. Instead, they suggest affluent spaces maintain existing disparities rather than exacerbate them or create a bridge between students. This result has implications for understanding how inequality persists through educational institutions.

Perspectives on Politics
When Poor Students Attend Rich Schools: Do Affluent Social Environments Increase or Decrease Participation? was authored by Tali Mendelberg, Vittorio Merola, Tanika Raychaudhuri and Adam Thal. It was published in POP in 2021. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S1537592720000699
Political Behavior subfield banner