FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights from Hundreds of Political Scientists

qualitative transparencydeliberative processmethodological guidanceresearch practiceMethodology@POPDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

This Perspectives Reflection synthesizes central findings from a three-year deliberative process involving hundreds of political scientists.

The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations (QTD)

* A series of public, online conversations at www.qualtd.net

* Focused on transparency norms in qualitative research

Key Insights & Concerns

* Promise: Enhanced openness and evaluability of empirical claims

* Practicalities: Implementation challenges across different methodologies

* Risks/Limitations: Potential unintended consequences for scholarly inquiry

* Nuances: Transparency's relevance varies by research context and evidence type

Practical Guidance Provided

* For scholars designing qualitative studies

* For editors, reviewers, and funders developing evaluation criteria

This synthesis offers actionable advice while honoring the diverse perspectives within political science.

Article card for article: Deliberative Archive For: The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications
Deliberative Archive For: The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications was authored by Alan M. Jacobs and Tim Büthe. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Perspectives on Politics
Edit article record marker