FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Pro-Choice Values Exist — But Not in How We Measure Democracy

Political Behavior subfield banner

### Questioning Key Political Science Explanatory Tool

The Index of Emancipative Values is widely used but often flawed. This article reveals its measurement model has significant misspecifications.

### Inconsistent Scale Across Cultural Zones and Countries

Analysis shows the IEV scale isn't invariant across cultural zones or countries within the World Values Survey data.

### Mixing Different Value Dimensions

The index mixes various value dimensions, which distorts their true associations with political outcomes like effective democracy.

### Novel Bayesian Approach Reveals Pro-Choice Subdimension

Using a new approximate Bayesian method,

* Researchers identify that 'pro-choice' values likely form a distinct subdimension measurable cross-nationally.

### Conceptual Debate Contribution

The study also advances the discussion on whether emancipative values are reflective or formative constructs by offering empirical evidence and thought experiments.

Article card for article: The Index of Emancipative Values: Measurement Model Misspecifications
The Index of Emancipative Values: Measurement Model Misspecifications was authored by Boris Sokolov. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
American Political Science Review