Skip to content
Saturday, April 18, 2026

More Questions than Answers

Journal of Unpublished Political Science Articles

Category: Law and Courts

  • Home
  • Law and Courts
  • Criminal justice
  • Law and Courts

Does Actual Innocence Matter? A Proposed Statistical Analysis of Appellate Outcomes

  • Barry Edwards
  • July 21, 2025
  • 0

The criminal justice system’s most fundamental promise is that the innocent will not be punished. Yet we know from decades of exoneration data that innocent people are regularly convicted and […]

  • Criminal justice
  • Law and Courts

Bringing Statistical Rigor to Appellate Standards: A Framework for Judicial Clarity

  • Barry Edwards
  • July 21, 2025
  • 0

The American appellate system faces a persistent problem that undermines the rule of law: the widespread confusion over which standards of review apply in different circumstances and how to implement […]

  • Criminal justice
  • Law and Courts

Do Appellate Courts Actually Correct Errors?

  • Barry Edwards
  • July 19, 2025
  • 0

The conventional wisdom about appellate courts is straightforward: they exist to correct errors made by trial courts. This textbook description portrays appellate courts as institutional safeguards, carefully reviewing lower court […]

  • Criminal justice
  • Law and Courts

Justice Scalia’s Strategic Voting in Arizona v. Fulminante

  • Barry Edwards
  • July 19, 2025
  • 0

Understanding how Supreme Court justices make decisions has long fascinated political scientists. While many analyses focus on the attitudinal model—the idea that justices simply vote for their preferred policy outcomes […]

  • Law and Courts

The State of Camera Access to America’s Courtrooms

  • admin
  • July 16, 2025
  • 0

The American public’s relationship with its judicial system has been shaped by dramatic moments of televised justice: the O.J. Simpson trial’s gavel-to-gavel coverage, the Casey Anthony proceedings that captivated millions, […]

Do Judges and Juries See Cases Differently? Rethinking the Severity Gap
  • Criminal justice
  • Law and Courts

Do Judges and Juries See Cases Differently? Rethinking the Severity Gap

  • admin
  • July 5, 2025
  • 0

A well-documented finding in legal research is that judges tend to render more severe verdicts than juries do when deciding the same cases. The table below compiles the results of […]

Cases that Illustrate Felony-Murder Rule
  • Criminal justice
  • Law and Courts

Cases that Illustrate Felony-Murder Rule

  • Barry Edwards
  • January 17, 2025
  • 0

Teaching a class on judicial process and politics, I located some interesting cases to illustrate the felony-murder rule. I think it’s an interesting legal doctrine and students were surprised to […]

Requiring that States Pay Jurors at Least Minimum Wage for Serving on Juries
  • Criminal justice
  • Law and Courts

Requiring that States Pay Jurors at Least Minimum Wage for Serving on Juries

  • Barry Edwards
  • January 15, 2025
  • 0

Jury service is a cornerstone of the American justice system, yet jurors in many states receive woefully inadequate compensation for their time and effort. Across the United States, the rates […]

  • Gun Politics
  • Law and Courts

A Critical Analysis of the Militia Perspective on the Right to Bear Arms in the Second Amendment

  • Barry Edwards
  • August 31, 2024
  • 0

I’d like to see an essay critically analyzing the militia perspective on the right to bear arms in the Second Amendment and exploring the implications of a possibly mistaken assumption. […]

Exploring the Influence of Dueling Norms on the Right to Bear Arms in Early America
  • American Politics
  • Gun Politics
  • Law and Courts

Exploring the Influence of Dueling Norms on the Right to Bear Arms in Early America

  • Barry Edwards
  • August 30, 2024
  • 0

The norms, customs, and rules surrounding dueling in early American history offer a unique perspective on the historical understanding of the right to bear arms. In the late 18th and […]

Posts navigation

Older posts

Recent Posts

  • A Wealth Tax is Fool’s Gold
  • Does Actual Innocence Matter? A Proposed Statistical Analysis of Appellate Outcomes
  • Bringing Statistical Rigor to Appellate Standards: A Framework for Judicial Clarity
  • Do Appellate Courts Actually Correct Errors?
  • Justice Scalia’s Strategic Voting in Arizona v. Fulminante

Categories

  • American Politics
  • Criminal justice
  • Gun Politics
  • Law and Courts
  • Political Analysis
  • Teaching and learning
  • Technology
  • Uncategorized
  • Voting and Elections

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Copyright © 2026 More Questions than Answers | Theme: Collective News By Adore Themes.